Quarantine or returning to work, that's a question. On March 24, at the meeting, US President Trump repeatedly expressed hope that social control measures would be lifted as soon as possible and economic activity would resume. He and his team claim to let the US "restart" before Easter. Is it an appropriate decision? For a president, quarantine of the coronavirus caused the direct consequences of the semi-stagnation of the US economy. In contrast, resumption of work means that countless U.S. workers will wait for the screening of the coronavirus with a mortality rate of 5.6%. For a worker, quarantine during outbreaks means loss of income, but reworking means possible threats to life safety. Obviously, this is a hard choice. As a result, a question has been raised: is the president's announcement about the resumption of work before "Easter" for the purpose of beautifying his political image, guiding people’s opinion of returning to work, or for deliberation? We would never know.
This poster belong to
FAKE NEWS!
Fake
news might feel like a recent development that has only come to
prominence since the election of one politician who shall not be named,
but the practice of spreading rumours and misinformation is as old as
the printed word.
People
have always twisted the truth, or simply told lies, to get what they
want (or change the world). But now we have the ability to share
information faster and wider than ever before. It used to be only a few
media outlets or government sources that could shape public thought, but
now everyone can.
And
unlike the media or government, none of us are held accountable for
what we post. As there are few laws or fines that can be thrown at us
for posting lies, there is no incentive to act responsibly in the public
sphere. Get likes (or votes) first, worry about potential consequences
later. If the self-styled leader of the free world can’t be held to
account for regularly tweeting and spreading blatant untruths, then what
stops everybody else from doing the same?
Readmore